The “Lesser of Two Evils” Fallacy | Psychology Today
文章推薦指數: 80 %
Life is a mixed bag. We are all forced to take the fleas with the dog. Lots. Every day you choose the best you can find among imperfect ... Skiptomaincontent JeremyE.ShermanPh.D.,MPP Ambigamy The“LesserofTwoEvils”Fallacy It’sactuallythelesseroftwodisappointingchoices. PostedNovember1,2016 | ReviewedbyEkuaHagan Share Tweet Email Lifeisamixedbag.Weareallforcedtotakethefleaswiththedog.Lots.Everydayyouchoosethebestyoucanfindamongimperfectoptions—“thelesseroftwoevils”asthesayinggoes.Andyoudoitwithamatureacceptancethatthat’showlifeis.Wedon’tgeteverythingwewant. Somepeoplesaythatinthiselectionwe’reforcedtovoteforthelesseroftwoevils,whichmeanswe’restillchoosingevil.Theysay,therefore,thatwe’rebetteroffnotvotingatall,orvotingforsomeothercandidateclosertoyouridealeventhoughtheyhavenochanceofwinningandmaybringthe“greateroftwoevils”intopower. “Lesseroftwoevils”is,forthemostpart,amisnomer.Sure,therearetimeswhenwearereallychoosingbetweentwoevils.InSophie’sChoice,forexample,SophiewasforcedbyNazistoseeoneofhertwochildrenkilled. Butweshouldn'tovergeneralizetheconcept.Thelesseroftwoevilsshouldreallybecalledthelesseroftwodisappointingoptions.Youhopedforoptionsclosertoyouridealbutthat’snotwhatyou’vegot.Thatdoesn’tnecessarilymeanthatyouroptionsareallevil.Perhapsyouroptionsarejustdisappointing.Orperhapsoneisevilandtheotherisjustdisappointing. Thinkofwhatamessyou’dmakeofyourlifeifyoucalledallchoicesbetweendisappointingoptions“thelesserofevils”andthereforerefusedtosupportevilbypickingamongyouroptions. Yourjobisn’tperfect,right?Norarethealternativejobsthatyoucouldoptforinstead.Soyoumightcallyourchoicebetween“lesseramongstevils.”Ifyourefusedtosupport“evil”youcouldchoosetobeunemployedasamatterofperfectionistprinciple.Oryoucouldoptforsomedreamjobyoucan’tget. Isyourromanticpartnershiplessthanperfect?Doesthatmakeyourpartnerthelesserofthe“evil”optionsavailabletoyou?Ifso,bythelogicsomepeopleareapplyingtotheelection,youshouldleaveyourpartnerbecauseheorsheisstillevil.Youshouldgoafterapartneryoucan’tgetwhichwillleaveyoueitheraloneorwithagreaterdisappointment. Somepeopledoapplythe“lesseroftwoevils”logicintheireverydaylife.Theyboltuprightandsay“I’mnotgoingtotakethisanymore.Nocompromise!”Itrarelyturnsoutwellforthem. Sowhydoweapplythatlogictoanationaldemocraticelection?Toliveinademocracymeanscompromise.Whysuddenlytheproudswitchtoano-compromiserulewhenmostofusknowbetterthantoapplythatruleineverydaylife? TheanswerIhearmostfromfriendswhoinsistthatvotingforeitherofthetwopossiblecandidatesisevilisbecausethesituationisdire.They’vetakenalltheycanandtotakemorewouldbetoomuchofacompromise.It’sacompromisetosupportevil.Myguessisthatthat’snotitandevenifitwereit,it’snotdemocracy.Democracyiscompromise. I’mguessingthat’sit’sactuallythatpoliticsisabstractconsumerism.It’snotpracticalconsumerismlikebuyingacarwhereyouknowyou’llbestuckwiththechoice.It’smakinganabstractchoicewheretheconsequenceswillplayoutambiguously.Politicsisoverwhelminglyvague.Wepickcandidatesbasedontheircharacterbecausenoneofushavetimeforadetailedanalysisoftheirissuesandpolicies.Soit’sabstractchoosing.It’seasytobeaperfectionistintheabstract. Andit’sconsumerism.Wehavebecomeanationofproud,happyshoppersaccustomedtobeingtoldthatwecannowexpectmoreandpayless. Weoftencan,butwithconsumergoods,notwithpeople.Ifyou’veeverbeenfrustratedwithapersonfornotbeingmorereliableandcustomizabletoyourpreferences,youmaybemistakingthemforaconsumerproduct.Consumerproductsareeasytotailortoreliablyfityourneeds. Butpeoplearestillpeople.We’reforcedtoputupwithstufffrompeoplethatwewouldnevertolerateinaconsumergood.We’ddemandanupgrade. Abstractconsumerisminpresidentialelectionsis,fromwhatIcantell,abigpartofthereasonsomepeoplecalltheelectionnextweekachoicebetweenthelesseroftwoevils,notnoticingthatwhattheyreallymeanisthelesseroftwodisappointingoptions. Andgrowingdisappointmentisabigpartofittoo.It’snoteasylettinggoofhighexpectations.Theworldhasbecomedisappointinglycomplicatedveryquickly.It’slikelythatinourlifetimes,we’llneverseethesimplerhappieroptionsofouryouthagain.Thinkofthequantityanddiversityofdisappointingchoicesournationhasfacedjustinthelasteightyears.We’renotusedtothat. Apresidentisaleaderbutalsoalightningrod.Weblameeverythingonthem,includinglotsofthingsoverwhichtheyhavelittleornoinfluence.Apresidentisascapegoatinchief. Manyofusaredisappointedintheamountofpanderingpoliticiansdo.Butthatpanderingismoreasymptomofourhighunadjustedexpectationsandabstractconsumerismthanitisofflawsofpoliticalcharacters.Youcan’tcompeteforthepresidencythesedayswithoutpandering,includingmeta-pandering—panderingaboutpandering,saying“You’regoodhonestfolk.Youdon’twantpandering.Youonlywantstraighttalkandthat’sallyou’llevergetfromme.” That’sdisappointingtoo,butnotevil.Justsomeofthefleaswehavetotakewiththedogofdemocracy.Disappointedornot,getoutandvote—fortheleastdisappointingamongtheavailableoptions. Share Tweet Email advertisement AbouttheAuthor JeremySherman,Ph.D., MPP,hasawideresearchagenda— psychologyfromcradletograve,life’soriginstoourgravesituation,groundedina25-yearclosecollaborationwithBerkeleyneuroscientist,biologicalanthropologistTerrenceDeacon. Online:JeremySherman,Facebook,Instagram,LinkedIn,Twitter ReadNext OvercomingPoliticalHateandPolarization WhatIsYourArgumentStyle? advertisement MostPopular 7SignsofDoominaRelationship IntimacyMatters:5PracticesforDeepListening 6SignsYouAreLyingtoYourself TheMentalHealthEffectsof"Ghosting" 10TipstoNurtureLong-LastingRomanticRelationships UnconsciousWaysPeopleFormRelationships advertisement FindaTherapist Getthehelpyouneedfromatherapistnearyou–aFREEservicefromPsychologyToday. CityorPostcode Countries: Australia Austria Belgium Canada Denmark HongKong Ireland NewZealand Singapore SouthAfrica Sweden Switzerland UnitedKingdom UnitedStates Back PsychologyToday Home FindaTherapist GetHelp Magazine Today Back FindaTherapist GetHelp FindaTherapist FindaTreatmentCenter FindaSupportGroup Members Login SignUp International Australia Austria Belgium Canada Denmark HongKong Ireland NewZealand Singapore SouthAfrica Sweden Switzerland Back GetHelp MentalHealth Addiction Anxiety ADHD Asperger's Autism BipolarDisorder ChronicPain Depression EatingDisorders Personality PassiveAggression Personality Shyness PersonalGrowth GoalSetting Happiness PositivePsychology StoppingSmoking Relationships LowSexualDesire Relationships Sex FamilyLife ChildDevelopment Parenting ViewHelpIndex DoINeedHelp? SelfTests TherapyCenterNEW RecentlyDiagnosed? DiagnosisDictionary TypesofTherapy TalktoSomeone FindaTherapist FindaTreatmentCenter FindaSupportGroup Back Magazine July2022 WhyWeKeepSoManySecrets Weallharborsecrets.Somearebigandbad;somearesmallandtrivial.Researchershaveparsedwhichtruthstotellandwhichnotto. Subscribe IssueArchive Back Today MostPopular 7SignsofDoominaRelationship IntimacyMatters:5PracticesforDeepListening 6SignsYouAreLyingtoYourself TheMentalHealthEffectsof"Ghosting" 10TipstoNurtureLong-LastingRomanticRelationships EssentialReads TheRelationshipSkillEveryCoupleMustKeepInMind TheMostImportantQuestioninTherapy AreYouLaughingWithMe?TheMeaningofLaughter 4ReasonsWhyPeopleAreHesitanttoSayKindWords TrendingTopics CoronavirusDisease2019 Narcissism Dementia Bias AffectiveForecasting Neuroscience
延伸文章資訊
- 1the lesser of two evils中文(繁體)翻譯:劍橋詞典
the lesser of two evils翻譯:兩害相權之輕者。了解更多。
- 2The lesser of two evils the lesser evil definition and meaning
If you have two choices, but think that they are both bad, you can describe the one which is less...
- 3Voting for the 'lesser evil' is a bad idea - BusinessWorld Online
The concept of “choosing the lesser evil” seems to say that when a person is faced with two undes...
- 4choose lesser of two evils - Linguee | 中英词典(更多其他语言)
大量翻译例句关于"choose lesser of two evils" – 英中词典以及8百万条中文译文例句搜索。
- 5THE LESSER OF TWO EVILS在劍橋英語詞典中的解釋及翻譯
the lesser of two evils的意思、解釋及翻譯:1. the less unpleasant of ... I had the choice of going with my ...