漢語心理動詞的格式與語意__國立清華大學博碩士論文全文影像 ...

詳目顯示 ; 169 · 格式、語意、心理動詞、認知表現 · construction、semantics、psychological predicates、psych verbs、cognitive representation · 推薦:0; 點閱:109; 評分: ... 資料載入處理中... 圖書館首頁| 網站地圖| 首頁| 本站說明| 聯絡我們| 相關資源| 台聯大論文系統| 操作說明 | English 簡易查詢 進階查詢 論文瀏覽 熱門排行 我的研究室 上傳論文 建檔說明 常見問題 帳號：guest(178.128.63.162)          離開系統 字體大小：       詳目顯示 第1筆/ 共1筆  /1頁 以作者查詢圖書館館藏、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士論文系統、以作者查詢全國書目 論文基本資料 摘要 外文摘要 論文目次 參考文獻 電子全文 作者(中文):賴蔚鍾作者(外文):Wei-jongLai論文名稱(中文):漢語心理動詞的格式與語意論文名稱(外文):ChinesePsychologicalPredicates:InteractionsbetweenConstructionsandSemantics指導教授(中文):連金發指導教授(外文):ChinfaLien學位類別:碩士校院名稱:國立清華大學系所名稱:語言學研究所學號:904707出版年(民國):93畢業學年度:92語文別:英文論文頁數:169中文關鍵詞:格式、語意、心理動詞、認知表現外文關鍵詞:construction、semantics、psychologicalpredicates、psychverbs、cognitiverepresentation相關次數: 推薦:0點閱:109評分:下載:27收藏:0 本研究中的「心理動詞」指描述感受或情感的動詞，如「愛」、「生氣」、「怕」等。

先前已有不少研究針對漢語心理動詞的語法現象作過探討。

其中不少是透過管束理論來看心理動詞的獨特性。

此篇論文的重點則在於探討漢語感受動詞的語意及句法的互動關係。

藉由不同感受類動詞所能進入的句式及格式，觀察彼此之間的語意差異，進而找出漢語感受動詞與其他類動詞的不同。

為求語料的真實性，本文中所引用之格式皆從「中研院漢語平衡語料庫」及Google中篩選，再經過筆者個人及同學的判斷而來。

此外，為求所研究之動詞皆具有代表性，本文主要陳列的六個感受動詞格式（即「愛」、「喜歡」、「怕」、「害怕」、「氣」、「生氣」），以及後來加入討論的「嚇」，都是屬於語料庫中詞頻偏高的動詞。

這七個動詞可分為三大類，第一類的成員包括「嚇」，為「客體-主語」謂語﹔第二類是「感受者-主語」謂語，包括動詞「愛」、「喜歡」及常作形容詞的「害怕」、「生氣」﹔第三類是跨一、二類的謂語，如「氣」和「怕」等。

這類動詞的論元結構因可兼有上述二類，因此在語意上常出現模擬兩可的情形。

我們在分析各個動詞所能進入的基本格式後，一一羅列，再進一步相互比較，找出彼此相異的格式型態及語意內涵。

在研究的過程中，我們發現了一些有趣的現象。

在此舉二個例子。

其一，就論元結構來說，在感受動詞所能進入的格式中，感受者(Experiencer)與客體(Theme)為必要論元，但他們不必然在所有句式中都同時體現。

另外，程度(Degree)副詞在感受動詞格式中佔有重要地位，有時甚至影響一個句子的合法性。

其二，就使動句與結果句的互動來說，我們發現在只有一個論元的格式中，原先帶有使動意義的動詞（如「嚇」）會選擇感受者作為主語。

同樣的格式如果多了一個賓語，則原先主語位置的感受者會被客體所取代。

同時，結果句的指涉也跟著不同。

本論文在第一章作概略性的介紹。

第二章提到一些分析時會用到的概念。

第三章作相關的文獻回顧。

第四及第五章進行語料上的分析與討論，第六章為總結。

TherehavebeennotafewstudiesonthesyntacticbehaviorsofChinesepsychologicalpredicates(orpsychverbs),denotingaffectionandemotionsuchaslove,angerandfear.MostofthemfocusontheuniquebehaviorswithintheGB(governmentandbinding)framework.Differentfromthem,thisthesisaimstoexploretheinteractionsbetweenconstructionsandmeaningsofpsychverbs.Weferretoutthesemanticvarietiesamongpsychologicalpredicatesbylookingintotheconstructionsinwhichtheycanorcannotoccur.Wethenlayoutthefeaturesbelongingtopsychverbsattheendofthisstudy.Toensuretheauthenticityofthedata,alltheconstructionsinthisthesiscomefromtheSinicaCorpusandGoogle.Toguaranteethattheselectedverbswouldberepresentativeones,wefocusonthediscussionaboutsevenverbs,i.e.ai4(love),xi3-huan1(like),qi4(angerorbeangry),sheng1-qi4(beangry),pa4(fear),hai4-pa4(beafraid)andxia4(frighten),whichareselectedduetothehighfrequencyofoccurrenceattheSinicaCorpus.Theycanbedividedintothreetypes.ThefirsttypeistheTheme-Subjectpredicates,e.g.xia4(frighten).ThesecondtypeistheExperiencer-Subjectpredicates,includingverbs,e.g.ai4(love),xi3-huan1(like)andadjectives,e.g.hai4-pa4(beafraid),sheng1-qi4(beangry).Thethirdtypeistheamphibiouspredicateslikeqi4(angerorbeangry)andpa4(fear).VerbsofthistypetendtoexpressambiguousreadingsbecausetheycanberegardedasTheme-Subjectand/orExperiencer-Subjectpredicatesatthesametime.Wecomparetheirbasicpatternsandobtainsomeinterestingfindings.Twoexamplesaregivenasfollows.Oneisabouttheargumentstructure.ExperiencerandThemeareimportantelementsbuttheymaynotnecessarilyappearsimultaneously.Experiencer,aswellasTheme,canbeshadedincertainconstructions.Inaddition,degreeadverbsplayacrucialroleincertainconstructions.Sometimestheyevendeterminethegrammaticalityofasentence.Theotherexampleisabouttheinteractionbetweencausativesandresultatives.Ifthereisonlyoneargumentinaconstruction,thepredicatewithCAUSEwillassignExperiencertothesubjectposition.However,whenthereisanobjectinthesameconstruction,thesubjectpositionwillbeassignedTheme.Experiencergoestotheobjectposition.Meanwhile,thereferentoftheresultativestatealterswiththeconstructions.Inthisthesis,ageneralintroductionisgiveninchapterone.Sometheoreticnotionsareprovidedinchaptertwo.Previousstudiesarereviewedinchapterthree.Chapterfourandfivecomprisethedataanalysis.Conclusionisgiveninthefinalchapter. TableofContentsPageChineseAbstract………………………………………………………iEnglishAbstract………………………………………………………iiAcknowledgement………………………………………………………iiiTableofContents……………………………………………………ivChapter1Introduction……………………………………………11.1GBApproaches.……………………………………………21.2ApproachestoAspectualSemantics.…………………41.3DiathesisApproaches.…………………………………51.4Corpus-basedApproaches………………………………61.5RemarksontheFourApproaches………………………71.6AimsofThisThesis.…………………………….………8Chapter2BasicTheoreticNotions.………………….102.1Events……………………………………………………….102.2ArgumentStructure………………………………………………152.3ConceptualStructure……………………………………………182.4FrameSemantics…………………………………………………212.5ConstructionGrammar...………………………………………232.6DiathesisAlternations…………………………………………252.7Summary……………………………………………………………26Chapter3LiteratureReview………………………………………273.1Wu’s(1993)LexicalDecompositionApproach……………273.2Pesetsky’s(1995)ZeroSyntax………………………………303.3Yang’s(2000)NullOperatorMovementHypothesis………333.4Changetal.(2000)andTheirMorpho-LexicalStrategies………………………363.5Liu’s(2002)InternalCauseandExternalCause………393.6ShortComments………………………………………………….40Chapter4DataAnalysis(1):ConstructionsandIssues……444.1SelectionofVerbs………………………………………………444.2TheEffectofSyllabicNumberonPsychologicalPredicates……………………484.3ConflationofPsychologicalPredicates……………………564.4BasicPatternsandCollocationsofLexicalItems………604.4.1Ai4愛(Love)…………………………………………………634.4.2Xi3-huan1喜歡(Like)….……………………………………694.4.3Qi4氣(AngerorGetAngry)...……………………………714.4.4Sheng1-qi4生氣(GetAngry)…….…………………………764.4.5Pa4怕(FearorBeAfraid)……….………………………794.4.6Hai-pa4害怕(BeAfraid).………………………………824.5ConcludingRemarks…………………………………………87Chapter5DataAnalysis(2):ContrastsandDiscussions…885.1Transitivity—AnOverview……………………………885.2ComplementVariants—ACloserLook…………………905.2.1Ai4andXi3-huan1.….……………………………………915.2.2Pa1andHai4-pa4………………………………………………935.2.3Qi4andSheng1-qi4………………………………………….965.3Agentivity……………………………………………………….1015.3.1AgentivityofQi4………………………………………….1025.3.2AgentivityofAi4-typeVerbs……………………………1035.3.3AdditionalRemarksonGu4-yi4andChuan2-xin1Chuan2-yi4…………1045.4TransitiveResultative………………………………1065.4.1DuplicationofPsychVerbs………………………………1075.4.2CausativeandResultativeMatter………………………1085.4.3UniquenessoftheVerbPa4………………………………1165.4.4EventTypes:ARoughCutfromtheComplements………1175.5Degree……………………………………………………1185.6Location…………………………………………………1225.6.1ConstructionsPreservedforPsychPredicates………1235.6.2TheConstructionPreservedforQi4……………………1255.6.3StatusofDegree……………………………………………1265.7Passivization…………………………………………1275.8IntransitiveResultative……………………………1305.8.1DistinctiveConstructionsforPsychVerbs…………1305.8.2TheMannerMatter…………………………………………1325.8.3OtherResultativeVariants………………………………1335.9Causation……………………………………………………..1365.10CognitiveRepresentation…………………………1395.11SpecialCases…………………………………………1435.12ConcludingRemarks……………………………………145Chapter6Conclusion……………………………………………147References..……………………………………………….……...152AppendixI:TableofBasicPatternsandCollocations……157AppendixII:VerbsandArgumentsonFrameNet………………164 ReferencesAnderson,StephenR.1971.OntheRoleofDeepStructureinSemanticInterpretation.FoundationsofLanguage6:197-219.Baker,M.1988.Incorporation:ATheoryofGrammaticalFunctionChanging.Chicago:UniversityofChicagoPress.Belletti,A.andL.Rizzi.1988.Psych-Verbsandθ-Theory.NaturalLanguageandLinguisticTheory6:291-352.Carlson,Greg.1977.AUnifiedAnalysisoftheEnglishBarePlural.LinguisticsandPhilosophy1:413-457.Chang,Li-Li,Keh-JannChenandChu-RenHuang.2000.AlternationAcrossSemanticsField:AStudyofMandarinVerbsofEmotion.InternationalJournalofComputationalLinguisticsandChineseLanguageProcessing5(1):61-80.Chang,Li-li.etal.2000.ALexical-SemanticAnalysisofMandarinChineseVerbs:RepresentationandMethodology.InternationalJournalofComputationalLinguisticsandChineseLanguageProcessing5(1):1-18.Chao,YuenRen.1968.AGrammarofSpokenChinese.Berkeley:UniversityofCaliforniaPress.Chen,Dong-dong.1994.UTAH:ChinesePsychVerbsandBeyond.InJoseCamachoandLinaChoueiri(eds.),Proceedingsofthe6thNorthAmericanConferenceonChineseLinguisticsVol.1.LosAngles:GSIL,USC.Chomsky,Noam.1981.LecturesonGovernmentandBinding.Dordrecht:Foris.Davidson,Donald.1967.TheLogicalFormofActionSentences.InN.Rescher(ed.),TheLogicofDecisionandAction,81-95.Pittsburgh:UniversityofPittsburghPress.ReprintedinDavidson1980.Davidson,Donald.1980.EssaysonActionsandEvents.Oxford:ClarendonPress.Dowty,DavidR.1979.WordMeaningandMontagueGrammar:TheSemanticsofVerbsandTimesinGenerativeSemanticsandinMontague’sPTQ.Dordrecht:Reidel.Dowty,David.1991.ThematicProto-RolesandArgumentSelection.Language67:547-619.Fillmore,CharlesJ.andBerylT.Atkins.1992.TowardaFrame-BasedLexicon:TheSemanticsofRISKanditsneighbors.InA.LahrerandE.Kittay(eds.),Frames,Fields,andContrast,75-102.Hillsdale,NJ:Erlbaum.Goldberg,AdeleE.1995.Constructions:AConstructionGrammarApproachtoArgumentStructure.Chicago:TheUniversityofChicagoPress.Grimshaw,Jane.1990.ArgumentStructure.Cambridge,Mass.:MITPress.Hale,Kenneth,andSamuelJ.Keyser.1993.OnArgumentStructureandtheLexicalExpressionofSyntacticRelations.InK.HaleandS.J.Keyser(eds.),TheViewfromBuilding20,53-109.Cambridge,Mass.:MITPress.Hu,Yu-shuandXiaoFan(eds.)1995.DongciYanjiu[StudiesonVerbs].Kaifeng:HenanUniversityPress.Huang,Chu-ren,etal.2000.TheModule-AttributeRepresentationofVerbalSemantics:FromSemanticstoArgumentStructure.InternationalJournalofComputationalLinguisticsandChineseLanguageProcessing5(1):19-47.Huang,Han-Chun.1998.LexicalPolysemyandSenseExtensioninVerbsofMovementinTaiwaneseSouthernMin.M.A.Thesis.Hsinchu:NationalTsingHuaUniversity.Huang,Shuan-fan.1974.MandarinCausative.JournalofChineseLinguistics2(3):354-369.Jackendoff,Ray.1990.SemanticStructures.Cambridge,Mass.:MITPress.Kratzer,Angelika.1996.SeveringtheExternalArgumentfromitsVerbs.InJohanRooryckandLaurieZaring(eds.)PhraseStructureandtheLexicon,109-137.Dordrecht:Kluwer.Lakoff,George.1970.IrregularityinSyntax.NewYork:Holt,RinehartandWinston.Lakoff,GeorgeandMarkJohnson.1980.MetaphorsWeLiveby.Chicago:TheUniversityofChicagoPress.Langacker,RonaldW.1991.Concept,ImageandSymbol:theCognitiveBasisofGrammar.Berlin:MoutondeGruyter.Levin,Beth,andTovaRapoport.1988.LexicalSubordination.ProceedingsoftheChicagoLinguisticsSociety24,Part1,275-289.Chicago:ChicagoLinguisticsSociety.Levin,Beth.1993.EnglishVerbClassesandAlternations--APreliminaryInvestigation.Chicago:TheUniversityofChicagoPress.Lien,Chinfa.1999.ATypologicalStudyofCausativesinTaiwaneseSouthernMin.TsingHuaJournalofChineseStudies,NewSeries29:395-422.Liu,Mei-Chun.2002.MandarinVerbalSemantics:ACorpus-basedApproach,2ndEdition.Taipei:CranePublishingCo.McCawley,James.1968.LexicalInsertioninTransformationalGrammarwithoutDeepStructure.ProceedingoftheChicagoLinguisticSociety4,71-80.Chicago:ChicagoLinguisticsSociety.Mei,Jia-ju,etal.1993.TongyiciCilin[Thesaurus].Taipei:TungHuaBookCo.Perlmutter,D.M.andP.M.Postal.1984.The1-AdvancementExclusivenessLaw.InD.M.PerlmutterandC.Rosen(eds.)1984.StudiesinRelationalGrammar2.Chicago:UniversityofChicagoPress.Pesetsky,David.1995.ZeroSyntax:ExperiencesandCascades.Cambridge,Mass.:MITPress.Postal,Paul.1971.Cross-overPhenomena.NewYork:Holt.RinehartandWinston.Ryle,Gilbert.1949.TheConceptofMind.Chicago:TheUniversityofChicagoPress.Saeed,JohnI.1997.Semantics.Cambridge,Mass.:BlackwellPublisher.Shen,Jia-xuan.2000.JushiyuPeija[SyntaxandValency].ZhongguoYuwen277:291-297Tai,JamesH.-Y.1985.TemporalSequenceandWordOrderInChinese.InJohnHaiman(ed.),IconicityinSyntax,49-72.Amsterdam:JohnBenjaminsPublishingCompany.Tai,JamesH.-Y.2002.ConceptualStructuresandNon-autonomousSyntax:SomeConceptualizationPrinciplesinChineseGrammar.ContemporaryLinguistics4(1):1-12Tang,C.–C.Jane.1989.ChineseReflexives.NaturalLanguageandLinguisticsTheory7:93-121.Tang,Ting-chi.1991.HanyuYufadeBingruXianxiang[IncorporationinMandarinGrammar].TsingHuaJournalofChineseStudies,NewSeries21:1-63,337-376.Teng,Shou-Hsin.1996.ChineseSynonymsUsageDictionary.Beijing:BeijingLanguage&CultureUniversityPress.Tenny,Carol&JamesPustejovsky(eds.)2000.EventsasGrammaticalObjects:TheConvergingPerspectiveofLexicalSemanticsandSyntax.Stanford:CSLI(CenterfortheStudyofLanguageandInformation)Publications.Tsai,Mei-Chih,Chu-RenHuangandKeh-JiannChen.1996.YouJinyiciBianyiBiaozhunKanYuyiJufaZhiHudong[FromNear-synonymstotheInteractionsbetweenSyntaxandSemantics].InY.Yin,etal.(eds.),ChineseLanguageandLinguisticsV:InteractionsinLanguage,439-459.Taipei:InstituteofLinguistics,AcademiaSinica.Tsai,Mei-chih,Chu-RenHuang,Keh-JiannChen,andKathleenAhrens.1998.TowardsaRepresentationofVerbalSemantics:AnApproachBasedonNear-Synonyms.ComputationalLinguisticsandChineseLanguageProcessing3(1):62-74.Tsao,Feng-fu,L.TsaiandS.Liu.2001.ShentiyuPiyu:YuyianyuRenzhideShouyaoJiemian[BodyandMetaphor:ThePrimaryInterfacebetweenLanguageandCognition].Taipei:CranePublishingCo.VanVoost,Jan.1992.TheAspectualSemanticsofPsychologicalVerbs.LinguisticsandPhilosophy15:65-92.Vendler,Zeno.1967.LinguisticsinPhilosophy.Ithaca:CornellUniversityPress.Wang,Hong-bin.1998.JueduiChengduFuciyuXinliDongciZuhehosuoChuxiandeChengduYikongFanchou[TheEmptyCategoriesInducedfromtheCombinationofAbsoluteDegreeAdverbsandPsychVerbs].YantaiNormalUniversityJournal(PhilosophyandSocialSciencesEdition)1998(1):63-70.Wu,Xiu-zhi.Zoe.1993.PsychologicalPredicatesinChinese.M.A.Thesis.Taipei:NationalTaiwanNormalUniversity.Yang,Hua.1994.ShilunXinliZhuangtaiDongcijiqiBinyudeLeixing[AnInvestigationonPsychStativeVerbsandtheirObjectTypes].Han-YuXue-xi1994(3):33-36.Yang,Su-fen.2000.OnChinesePsychVerbs.M.A.Thesis.Hsinchu:NationalTsingHuaUniversity.Zhou,You-binandJing-minShao.1993.HanyuXin-liDongcijiqiJuxing[MandarinPsychVerbsandtheirConstructions].YuwenYanJiu48:32-36,48.Zipf,GeorgeKingsley.2000.ThePsycho-biologyofLanguage:AnIntroductiontoDynamicPhilology.NewYork:Routledge.OnlineResources:AcademiaSinicaBalancedCorpusofModernChinese:http://www.sinica.edu.tw/ftms-bin/kiwi1/mkiwi.shFrameNet:http://www.icsi.berkeley.edu/~framenet/ 封面中文摘要英文摘要誌謝辭目錄第一章第二章第三章第四章第五章第六章參考文獻附件1附件2(1)附件2(2) 推文 推薦 評分 引用網址 轉寄         top 相關論文 1. 威廉氏症候群中文語言能力之探索 2. 語言接觸引發的演變---以台灣華語「給」為例 3. 中文小孩在『比』字句的習得研究 4. 「以為」的歷史演變 5. 成語的探索：概念、詞彙、格式的透視 6. 中文使動與啟動動詞交替之習得 7. 從構式語法看漢語結果複合動詞 8. 台灣閩南語動詞的始動與起動交替--與中英文比較 9. 閩南語指示位移動詞「來」、「去」語意及格式之研究 10. 台灣閩南語「有」的格式探索 11. 台灣閩南語正反問句中否定助動詞的系統 12. 探討台灣閩南語「講」的多功能性 13. 漢語情態動詞語意研究:由方言比較入手 14. 閩南語感嘆句研究：形式與功能之匯聚 15. 台灣閩南語目的句     簡易查詢 | 進階查詢 | 論文瀏覽 | 熱門排行 | 管理/審核者登入